Israeli Chapter of the Society for Conservation Biology
Israeli Chapter of the Society for Conservation Biology
  • Home
  • About
  • ICCS conference
    • Program
    • Keynotes
    • Presentation guidelines
  • Events
  • Newsletters
  • Announcements
  • Publications
  • Links
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • ICCS conference
    • Program
    • Keynotes
    • Presentation guidelines
  • Events
  • Newsletters
  • Announcements
  • Publications
  • Links
  • Contact

Israel 100 - Plans for Israel at 2048 presented and debated at the 2nd ICCS

15/5/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
As an intrinsically multi- and interdisciplinary subject, conservation biology can greatly benefit by integrating the work of spatial and strategic planners and by encouraging conservation scientists to participate in planning processes. The 2nd meeting of the Israeli Chapter of the Society for Conservation Biology emphasized the importance of linking biological conservation with strategic planning by featuring a plenum panel discussion on “Israel 100 - Planning, Ecological Thresholds, and Biological Conservation.” Israel 100, a multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional initiative for strategic
planning for Israel’s centennial (2048), was presented by Professor Shamay Assif of Technion’s Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning. Assif, as former head of planning at the Israeli Ministry of Interior and former chief engineer of Tel-Aviv (among other positions), has extensive experience in dealing with complex planning issues and has had tremendous influence on national and urban strategic planning in Israel – experience he now brings to his guiding work on Israel 100. Assif shared with the audience the process now taking place to analyze multiple trends and emerging societal needs in Israel, and integrate them into national strategic planning. Ofer Lerner, a professional planner, showed how the Technion is contributing its part to this national effort by identifying particular and crucial societal trends that will need to be addressed in Israel’s near future. Dr. Miri Tsalyuk, currently a post-doctoral fellow at Hebrew University shared her progress on defining ecological “red-lines”, work being conducted with Professors Eran Feitelson and Eli Stern and others.
Following the presentations of representatives of the Israel 100 planning team, key figures in the conservation community in Israel were asked to respond, including Dr. Yehoshua Shkedy (Chief Scientist of the Israel Nature and Parks Authority), Professor. Tamar Dayan of Tel-Aviv University, Iris Hann (planner, lawyer and CEO of the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel) and Professor. Alon Tal of Tel-Aviv University. The panelists challenged our capacity to safeguard biological conservation in Israel with a continuously growing human population. Indeed, as Prof. Assif suggested, Israel 100 needs to plan for building “a second Israel” in order to facilitate for the country’s growing demand for housing, infrastructure and economic development. “Red Lines” were also debated, including whether we can rely on strictly defined reserves and open spaces for long-term biodiversity conservation, or whether conservation must take place at all levels and under all types of land use regimes. The importance of ecological corridors was discussed, with an understanding that some of Israel’s designated corridors are in danger of closing due to encroaching construction and development.
The conference keynote speakers, Prof. Kevin Gaston and Dr. Monika Böhm, provided concluding remarks, highlighting the need for clear and specific targets for conservation planning in Israel and urged that the state of biodiversity in the world and in Israel should be seen as in crisis. Importantly, the audience had a chance to see how biodiversity conservation was being discussed and integrated into the strategic planning process, and how they – as conservation scientists – can take a more pro-active role in assuring the prioritization of biodiversity conservation in developing strategic and spatial plans, despite the immense challenges that exist and will emerge in the near future. They suggested that protection of our natural assets must be a fundamental basis for, not an additional component of, the
Israel 100 process, and that we – as conservation scientists – should take a more pro-active role in assuring the prioritization of biodiversity conservation in developing strategic and spatial plans, despite the immense challenges that exist and that will emerge in the near future.

Prof. Daniel Orenstein
Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning,
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

Picture
1 Comment

The Living Planet Report 2018: Aiming Higher

14/1/2019

1 Comment

 
At the end of 2018, WWF published their twelfth, bi-annual report on the status of biodiversity, highlighting the importance
of global conservation efforts - the living planet report. Their message is clear: unsustainable human activity is pushing the planet’s natural systems that support life on Earth to the edge. In the 1950s, the Great Acceleration began to dramatically increase the global human population by improving our quality of life, leading to an increase in the demand for energy, land, water, and increasing overall consumption. The products we consume, the supply chains behind them, the raw materials and export routes we use all have a
significant impact on the environment. Scientists now claim that the Holocene period has ended and we entered a new era, the “Anthropocene”.
Through data collection, tracking and analysis tools, specific impacts on biodiversity can be monitored. In addition, it is important to understand the different threats between different regions and how different species are affected by them in different ways. The Living Planet Index (LPI), provided by the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), is an indicator of the current state of global biodiversity, based on trends in vertebrate populations from around the world.
Picture
The index shows a general decline of 60% in population sizes from 1970- 2014 (Fig 20). The decline is especially evident in the tropics, with South and Central America experiencing a dramatic decline of 89% in population sizes since 1970. Freshwater species have also declined dramatically; 83% since 1970. Measuring biodiversity on Earth is complex, so this report also examines three other indicators, measuring changes in species distribution, extinction risks and changes in community composition. All of these draw the same picture - showing sharp drops or changes.
The report listed habitat degradation, unsustainable exploitation of resources, invasive species and climate change as the main causes of the declines in biodiversity we see today (Figure 15). This latest assessment found that only one quarter of the earth is not currently being exploited by man. In the marine system, 6 million tons of fish have been removed from the oceans since the 1950s. Plastic is now
found in all marine systems, from the coasts to the depths, with an estimate of between 4.8 to 12.7 million tonnes of land-based plastic waste entering the ocean in 2010 alone.
Today, ecosystem services to humans are estimated at $ 125 trillion a year, including pollination, pharmaceutical production, clean water availability, renewable energies, biomimicry and more. The current Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) vision is that “By 2050, biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people”.
Picture
The report stresses that achieving this ambitious goal will require changes that come from governments, businesses, research, civil society as well as from personal choices and actions. The window of opportunity must be exploited in order to change the trajectory of biodiversity trends, by defining new targets for beyond 2020 and developing sustainable industries.
Without a dramatic shift in global governance, the sharp decline of the natural systems supporting the Earth and the human population will continue. There is still some hope; modelling of trajectories suggest that there is still time to turn trends around (Figure 27). The good news is that governments and industries are beginning to ask how changes in the environment will affect the activities of their industries and financial markets. The question remains will they act quickly enough.

Itai Namir
Picture
1 Comment

    News published regularly in the ISCB newsletter. Maintained by Leigh Kroeger and Uri Roll

    Archives

    May 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All
    Announcements
    Ben-Gurion University
    Campaign
    ECCB
    Europe
    Events
    Fellowships And Awards
    Finland
    Global
    ICCB
    ICCS
    INPA
    Iris Hahn
    ISCB
    Living Planet Report
    Marine Plastics
    Mission Statetment
    Noam Ben-Moshe
    Planning
    Plastic Straws
    Policy
    Richard Grenyer
    SCB
    SPNI
    Spotlight
    Whaling
    WWF
    ZSL

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly